Friday, September 28, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for MWF

Section K:


Sonny's Team vs. Jayson's Team



Section P:

Alex Torralba's Team (Opposition) vs. Michelle's Team (Government)


Motion: This house finds the Ateneo Fiesta unnecessary.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for MWF Group (6)

Section K:

Hazel's Team vs. Sonny's Team



Section P:

Melbourne's Team vs. Alex See's Team



Motion: This house abolish Physical Education subjects.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for T-Th Group (New-1)

Jake's Team vs. Krista's Team

Motion: This House will allow Fraternity-related activities in school.

Match-Up and Motion for MWF Group(5)



Section K:



Ivy's Team vs. Leah Tan's Team




Section P:


Tadznihar's Team vs. Kay Lenz's Team




Motion: This House will legitimize Greek-lettered fraternities in the Ateneo.

Monday, September 24, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for T-Th Group (4)


Wangyu
Issa
Kitch


vs.

Melanie Claire
Fortunato
Caroline


Motion: This house will abolish foreign-inspired game shows on TV.

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Match Up and Motion for MWF Group (4)


Section K:


Kenneth Beldua's Team vs. Francis Tatel's team



Section P:


Alma May Bulanon's Team vs. Matthew Manogura's team




Motion:


TH will allow public displays of affection in school.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for T-Th Group (3)


Rheana

Kitch

Ken



vs.



Lorraine

Melanie Claire

Issa



Motion: This house believes that early sex is better.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Match-Ups and Motion for MWF Group (3)


Section K:


Leah Llaneza

John Austin Pereyra

Greg Sescon


vs.


Ian Jude Duramos

Timothy Go

Jul Czar Gimolatan


Adjudicators: Angelie, Monina, Sharmayda




Section P:


Jergen

Mariano

Marcena



vs.


Jericho A.K.A Britney

Alex T.

Rafael



Adjudicators: Angelika, Crystal, Ricardo



MOTION: This house will get rid of tricycles.

Mtach-Up and Motion for Tues-Thurs Group (2)

Jolicar Buchan
Wangyu Idris
Mark Mabalot

vs.

Moses Mendoza
Pauleen Santos
Cherry Laranjo * (stand-in for Ken)


For the motion, pls. check your emails.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Match-Ups and Motions for MWF Group (2)


Section K:

Junari
Michael Franz
Dabert

vs.

Sharmaida
Flordeliz May
Ma. Liza Monina


Adjudicators:

Louanna, Raychelle, Tehanee



Section P:

Nastassja
Ricardo
Michelle


vs.

Angelika Lucero
Rhonna
Crystal


Adjudicators: Gretel, Louie, Divine


Motion: TH will allow females to become priests

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for the Tues-Thurs Group (2)


Christopher Jake Reyson
Gerald Pioquinto

Reiji Buenaventura

vs.

Anjo Aldenese
Valery Pioquinto

Robelyn Graciano




Motion: TH will make 80 the passing grades in minor subjects

Monday, September 10, 2007

Match-Ups and Motion for MWF Group (1)


Section K:


April Joyce S.; Ivan Rey E.; Miriam Ashiya A.


vs


Louanna Erika U.; Raychelle Dorothea J.; Tenahee A.


Adjudicators: Kenneth, Mari Alexandria, Jayson




Section P:


Gretel H.; Louie D.; Divine A.


vs


Eigen, Ryan, Rajeev


Adjudicators: Jeregn, Mariano, Marcena




Motion: TH will place age restrictions on alcohol and beer consumption



Sunday, September 9, 2007

Match-Up and Motion for the Tues-Thurs Group (1)

Match-Up:

1. Danyll dL S.
2. Joseph L.
3. Arnie D.

Versus:

1. Krista V.
2. Esra B.
3. Bea T.


Motion: TH will no longer divide Zamboanga City into 2 districts.

An Apology


To the M-W-F guys,

Let me begin by first saying how sorry I am for not posting the match-ups and the motion last Sunday. This is because I felt sick over the weekend so I had no opportunity to post the said updates. I am truly sorry.

Having said that, debates will resume this Wednesday, so please so vist our page this Tuesday. Thank you so much for understanding. Below is a copy of our lecture in debate. Please review.


Sir Jon

_______________________________________________________


Ateneo Debate Education Program

Why debate?

Part One:
MECHANICS (What an Asian Parliamentary Debate Looks Like)

The Basics

  • There are 2 teams with 3 members per team, and 2 sides (Government and Opposition)
  • Each speech lasts for about 7 minutes, with the first and last minute uninterrupted
    • In the remaining 5 minutes, members from the opposing side can raise POINTS OF INFORMATION
    • A point of information lasts for a maximum of 15 seconds
    • Motions are given a day prior to the debate

Part Two:
RULES (The Technical Stuff)

Motion

it is the proposition which the Government side is supposed to defend

there are three types of motions:

Open motions

Semi-closed motions

Closed motions

Motions must be defined by the Prime Minister

More on this later under Speaker Roles

Definitions

Each definition MUST:

Have a direct link to the motion

Be fair and debatable

Identify the issues to be debated and the scope of the debate (criteria or standard)

Include parameters when necessary

Unfair definitions:

Bad or illegal definitions

are usually challenged

(more on this later)

Truisms

“Squirrels”

Time/Place Sets

Tautologies

Rules for Challenging

If a definition provided by the Prime Minister is judged to be a truism, squirrel, time/place set, or a tautology, a definitional challenge may be made

ONLY the Leader of Opposition may initiate and issue a definitional challenge

If the LO doesn’t challenge, NO ONE else in the debate may do so

LO provides an alternative correct definition which he must oppose

Even-if arguments for both sides

No automatic wins

Team and Speaker Roles

An Overview

Government

provide a clear and reasonable definition

establish the issues and scope of the debate

advance a substantive case

The Prime Minister

must:

introduce the definition and provide a link to the motion

introduce the case of the OG

introduce substantive material to support his/her side of the split

The Deputy Prime

Minister must:

rebut the points of the LO

Support the arguments of the PM

Introduce substantive material to support his/her side of the split

Opposition

Examine the definition of Government

Challenge or accept the definition

Rebut the arguments of Government

Advance a substantive case

the Leader of

Opposition must:

Accept or reject the definition and provide a link to the motion

Rebut the points of the PM

introduce the case of the OO

introduce substantive material to support his/her side of the split

The Deputy Leader

of Opposition must:

rebut the points of the DPM

Support the arguments of the LO

Introduce substantive material to support his/her side of the split

Whips

the Opposition Whip

must:

Summarize the debate

Reiterate and support the points of the entire opposition side

Introduce fresh examples to support/rebut previously mentioned arguments

the Government

Whip must:

Summarize the debate

Reiterate and support the points of the entire gov’t side

Introduce fresh examples to support/rebut previously mentioned arguments

Part Three:
Matter, Manner, Method

It’s the meat in your sandwich, the heart of the matter

Matter

Arguments

Rebuttal

POI’s

Matter: Definition

The content of the speech. It is the arguments a debater uses to further his or her case and persuade the audience

Includes arguments, reasoning, and examples

Includes positive (substantive material) and rebuttal

Includes points of information

Soon to follow:

What is an argument?

Rebuttal

Points of Information

What is an argument?

the reason why you support or oppose a motion

argument versus premise

Arguments must

be backed by:

Analysis: go beyond the label and ask the most important question: WHY?

Examples: use relevant ones and DON’T argue by example

Rebuttal

All speakers, except the Prime Minister, are expected to present rebuttal

Types of rebuttal:

Error of fact

Irrelevancy

Illogical Argument

Unacceptable Implications

Little Weight

Contradictions and Inconsistencies

How much rebuttal is too much rebuttal?

- Response triangle

POIs!

Keep it short: You just have fifteen seconds!

It is the discretion of the person speaking whether to recognize the point or not

Types of POIs:

Clarification

Question

Direct rebuttal

Introducing your argument

Bringing back your argument

How often should I raise points of information?

How many points of information should I ask?

- Respond to the POIs you’ve accepted

Manner

It matters

how you say it…

Manner: Definition

The presentation of the speech. It is the style a member uses to further his or her case and persuade the audience

Comprised of many separate elements.

There is no correct style of debating

Don’t be tentative!

Some things to keep in mind:

Eye contact

Voice modulation

Hand gestures

Clear and simple language

Efficient notes

Look like you’re winning

Method: Definition

Can be divided into individual method and team method

Individual method refers to the organization of your speech

Team method refers to the flow and consistency of the arguments of the two speakers in a team

Two Kinds of Method

Individual method:

Structure your speech

Sign-posting

Time management

Team method:

Allocate your arguments properly

If you are the first speaker, give a team split

If you are the second speaker, refer to your partner regularly

Other things to

remember:

LISTEN

MAINTAIN

PROPER

CONDUCT

Thursday, September 6, 2007